How to Evaluate New Cards for Cube: A Working Method

The fastest way to evaluate cards for cube is to stop asking “is this card good?” and start asking “which card in my cube does this replace?” A new set has 250 to 300 cards. Your cube has a fixed number of slots, and almost all of them are already filled by something that earned its place. A new card has to beat an incumbent, in that color, at that cost, doing that job. Once you frame it that way, 95 percent of a spoiler season evaluates itself in an afternoon.

This article is the method. The next one, a set review template, is the form to fill out. Together they let a cube owner read six or seven sets a year without panicking or missing anything.

Why is cube evaluation different from Standard or Limited?

Reviewers for Standard rate a card against a metagame. Limited reviewers rate it against the other cards in the same packs. Cube is neither. Your opponent’s deck is drawn from the best cards of more than thirty years, and your own deck will be too.

That changes three things:

• The bar is the best card ever printed at that job. A new two-mana red creature is not competing with the other red two-drops in its set. It is competing with Kari Zev, Perfect Pyromancer and Robber of the Rich, and whatever else you already run.
• Synergy is only worth what your cube supports. A card that is excellent in a Standard artifact deck is a blank in a cube with twelve artifacts. Read every card against your own archetype list, not against the set’s themes.
• Rarity means nothing. Some of the best cube pickups in any set are uncommons. Some mythics never make a list anywhere.

So the first discipline is to ignore the hype entirely. Prices, preorder rankings, and Commander excitement tell you almost nothing about whether a card belongs in a 540-card draft environment.

What is the slot test?

Every card in a cube occupies a slot: a color, a mana value, and a role. When a new card arrives, name its slot in one line. “White, two mana, aggressive creature.” “Blue, four mana, card advantage.” “Colorless, five-plus, finisher.” If you cannot name the slot, the card is probably not a cube card.

Then list the cards already in that slot. For most slots you will have between three and eight. Ask one question: would I cut one of these for the new card? If the answer is no, the review is done. Write “pass” and move on.

If the answer is maybe, you have a test candidate. If the answer is an immediate yes, you have a keep, and you should also ask whether the card is strong enough to change how the slot works. A card that is clearly better than everything else at its job is sometimes a problem rather than a gift, especially in unpowered or lower-power cubes. See cards too strong for an unpowered cube for how we handle that.

Which questions sort cards fastest?

Run every candidate through the same short list. The order matters, because each question eliminates more cards than the one after it.

1. Does it do its job alone? A creature that needs another card to be good is a two-card combination. Cube decks play about 23 spells out of 45 picks; you will not reliably assemble pairs. Cards that stand alone first and reward synergy second are the ones that stick.
2. Is it on curve for its role? Aggro wants its payoff by turn three. Control wants a two-for-one by turn four. A card that is one mana too expensive for its effect is usually a pass, no matter how large the effect is.
3. Does it play well from behind? Cube games swing. Cards that only matter when you are already winning, like anthems with no body, rarely survive testing.
4. Does it fit an archetype we actually support? Check your archetype list. If the card wants a deck you do not run, it is a pass unless it is strong enough to stand alone.
5. Does it make games better? Some cards are powerful and miserable: hard locks, repeatable discard on turn two, uninteractive combos. A card can pass every test above and still not belong in your cube. This is a design choice, and it is yours.

A card that answers yes to the first four questions goes into testing. A card that fails the first two almost never recovers on the strength of the last three.

If this is useful, the newsletter sends more like it.

How do you read a spoiler without wasting a weekend?

Set reviews take as long as you let them. Here is a schedule that works for a 540-card cube and one person doing the reading.

The first pass is where people lose time. Do not read every card’s rules text closely. Read the mana cost and type line, and only slow down when the card could occupy a slot you have. In most sets, that is 30 to 50 cards out of 280.

Expect to test five to ten cards per set and keep two to four. Those are house numbers, not a standard, and sets vary. A set built around a mechanic your cube supports (artifacts, graveyard, tokens) can produce twice that. A set built around a mechanic you do not run can produce none, and that is a fine result.

What are the common evaluation mistakes?

We have made all of these, so this is a list from experience rather than theory.

• Rating by Standard results. A card dominates Standard because its competition is narrow. It arrives in cube and meets Swords to Plowshares on turn one. Standard playability is a weak signal.
• Overvaluing new mechanics. New keywords are exciting during spoiler season. Six months later, most are just text. Evaluate what the card does, not how novel the way it does it is.
• Counting reprints as free. A reprinted staple at a new rarity is good news for your wallet. It changes nothing about whether the card belongs in your list, because you could already have run it.
• Testing too many at once. Swap in twelve cards and you cannot tell which ones changed the draft. Four or five per round is enough to see each one get drafted and played.
• Not writing anything down. Three sets later you will not remember why you cut a card. A one-line log entry per decision saves you re-testing the same card every year.
• Forgetting the color’s identity in your cube. If black in your cube is removal, recursion, and sacrifice, a black card that does something else entirely can be strong and still not fit, because nobody drafting black is looking for it.

How does this change by power level?

The method is the same at every power level. The incumbents change.

In a Vintage-style cube, the bar in most slots is already a famous card, so new sets mostly produce test candidates in the two-drop and three-drop creature slots where power creep is steadiest. In a Legacy or Modern-power cube without fast mana, more slots are contestable and a single set can bring in five or six cards. In a Pauper or Peasant cube, the rarity ceiling means an ordinary set at common and uncommon can be the best thing that happened all year.

Know which of these describes your cube before spoiler season starts. It sets your expectations, and it stops you from pulling a mythic into a list where it will never lose a game.

FAQ

How many cards from a new set should make a cube?

Two to four for a typical 540-card cube at Legacy or Vintage power. Zero is a legitimate result, and more than six usually means your list had soft slots to begin with.

Should I test cards before adding them permanently?

Yes. Proxy the candidates, run two or three drafts, and watch whether they get picked and whether they do what you expected when played. Testing is cheaper than buying and cutting.

Do reprints count as new cube cards?

No. A reprint lowers the price of a card you could already run. It does not change the card’s evaluation. The exception is a reprint with new rarity that makes a card eligible for a Pauper or Peasant list.

What is the single best question to ask about a new card?

“What does it replace?” If you cannot name the card it would push out of your cube, it is not going in.

Keep reading with us

New cards keep coming. Subscribe to The Ludarium newsletter for new cube pieces, and to hear when Cube Commonwealth, our Indianapolis cube group, sets its first night as part of The Ludarium. The game is the reason. The people are the point.